Looking back on this project

7 08 2009

This is the part where I say goodbye, so here it goes…

I chose to do this project because its deals with an issue that is timely and current. The NBA changed its age limit starting with the 2006 draft. Up until 2005, players could be drafted right after high school. The new rule made it so that players had to be one year removed from their high school graduation and 19 years of age to enter the draft. In my opinion, this rule change is discriminatory and prevents 18-year-olds, who are of course legal adults, from pursuing their professional careers and earning a living.

A big part of the reason why I chose to pursue this project was the pioneering move made by Brandon Jennings last year. Jennings failed to pass the entrance exam in order to attend college, and with the NBA not an option, he chose to skip school and sign with a pro team in Italy. Jennings played there for one season, made over $1 million dollars and entered the draft this year. He was taken with the 10th overall pick by the Milwaukee Bucks. I find his story very interesting and it really makes me wonder why the NBA would be willing to let talented players like Jennings start their careers overseas. I truly believe that more and more players will do what Jennings did. Case in point, a San Diego standout named Jeremy Tyler is forgoing his senior year of high school to play in Europe for two seasons before entering the draft. What’s to stop even younger players from turning pro overseas and making good money?

This project matters because it deals with class; many of these players come from impoverished backgrounds. It deals with race; many of these players are African-American. Finally, it deals with education; many of the elite high school talents don’t really want to go to college, but only do so because of the NBA’s policy. This leads to three things: it makes a mockery out of college basketball, it severely hurts academic integrity, and it dramatically increases the chances of recruiting violations.

The number of “one-and-done” players hurts college basketball because it makes it very hard for programs to maintain continuity and sustain success, not to mention brings down the level of play. It also forces schools to think long and hard about the risks versus the rewards of taking on players who may attend for just one season. Academic integrity is hurt because “one-and-dones,” especially if they already know they’re declaring for the NBA, will only take their fall semester of classes seriously. The spring semester doesn’t matter because in their eyes, they’ll be in the league come summer. Even for players who leave for the NBA after their sophomore or junior seasons, very few end up making up the coursework to earn their degrees. In fact, four out of five retired NBA players (currently the average retirement age is 27) don’t have college degrees. When players don’t finish school, it hurts graduation rates among athletes and causes the loss of scholarships. Finally, perhaps the biggest drawback to players going to college who don’t really want to, are recruiting violations that can ruin a school’s program for many years. Two of the top NBA rookies from this past season, Derrick Rose and O.J. Mayo, are at the center of NCAA investigations into improprieties at the schools they attended, Memphis and USC respectively. The number of violations and investigations will only rise as long as talented players are made to delay their professional careers by one year.

I hope that my project contributes to society by showing people how unfair the NBA was on changing a policy that had done just fine since 1971. That year, Spencer Haywood successfully sued the NBA for the right to play in the league without being four years removed from high school graduation, which was the policy at the time. After Haywood’s U.S. Supreme Court victory, high school players and college underclassmen were allowed to enter the NBA draft.

Clockwise are the Magic's Rashard Lewis and Dwight Howard, the Cavaliers' LeBron James, the Lakers' Kobe Bryant and Andrew Bynum, and the Nuggets' J.R. Smith. What do they have in common? All are key contributors on the NBA's final four teams from this past season and all entered the league directly from high school.

Clockwise are the Magic's Rashard Lewis and Dwight Howard, the Cavaliers' LeBron James, the Lakers' Kobe Bryant and Andrew Bynum, and the Nuggets' J.R. Smith. What do they have in common? All are key contributors on the NBA's final four teams from this past season and all entered the league directly from high school. (AP photos)

To be fair, there have been some colossal busts drafted directly out of high school. Further, some of the preps taken over the years lacked the emotional and physical maturity to truly succeed. However, the very same criticisms can be made of more experienced prospects. I would hope that my project helps people realize that if someone has the talent, they should be able to pursue whatever it is they excel at, no matter their age. If a 10-year-old is smart enough to gain admission to college, and a 90-year-old is still sharp enough to serve as the District Attorney for New York (Robert Morgenthau), then what’s the big fuss over an 18-year-old trying to play professional basketball?

The age limit should be done away with and the NBA should heed the passionate words of Sonny Vaccaro, one of my interview subjects for this project: “If the professional bodies, the pro teams themselves, don’t think these kids can do it, don’t draft them. Don’t employ them!”

***

It’s been a long and eventful summer but I’ve definitely enjoyed the ride. Here are links to the main parts of my project:

- From high school to the NBA: A photo gallery chronicling the history

- The history of high schoolers in the NBA: The impact preps have made on the league from 1946 to 2009

- The ‘godfather of basketball’: My interview and profile of Sonny Vaccaro

- Review of the last five NBA drafts: An analysis of the players selected from 2005, the last draft to allow entry to high schoolers, through to this year. Here are my findings:

- Is a lawsuit on the NBA’s horizon?: Maurice Clarett challenged the NFL’s policy and lost. Will anyone take on the NBA’s age rule?

- How do other sports compare?: The entry policies for other professional leagues

- The Government vs. the NBA: Posts on lawmakers pressuring the league:

- Domino No. 3: Latavious Williams seeks to follow Brandon Jennings and Jeremy Tyler as high school stars who bypass college to play overseas

- The 2009 NBA draft: I blogged the proceedings and analyzed the numbers of underclassmen taken

- Stories still to come (hopefully): Pieces of of this project that are works in progress, but if achieved, will enhance the assignment





Stories still to come… (hopefully)

7 08 2009

With today being my soft deadline, the following three items are still being pursued:

1) An interview with Spencer Haywood, who made history in 1971. Haywood challenged in court the NBA’s rule that players had to be four years removed from high school. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in his favor and he paved the way for scores of underclassmen to enter the NBA.

I have been in contact with Haywood here in the last week but our schedules have conflicted. I’m aiming to interview him and post our talk by next Friday, the hard deadline for any revisions on this project.

2) A Q&A via email with Brandon Jennings. If you’ve followed this project at all, then you know about the role Jennings has played. He became the first player to skip college to play in Europe for one season before being drafted into the NBA. Others are already following his lead.

Questions have been forwarded to Jennings’ agent and I’m hoping to hear back from him (with a little help from Sonny Vaccaro). Hopefully, I will have something by next Friday.

3) Email interviews with the athletic directors of two high-profile NCAA Division I program about how the NBA’s age limit impacts the college game. I also want to find out how their schools deal with recruiting potential “one-and-dones,” what changes they would advocate, and whether or not the feel that academic integrity is being compromised.

I am awaiting a response from one school’s A.D., while still trying to covince the other A.D. to talk to me. I’ll see what I can land by next Friday.

***

I hope to have at least some, if not all, of this material here in the next week and I want to thank everyone who read and followed my project throughout the summer!





Is a lawsuit on the NBA’s horizon?

6 08 2009

Over the past few days, Maurice Clarett’s name has re-emerged in the news. The former Ohio State running back is currently in prison and was being talked about in the media because of his decision to withdraw his request for early release. Clarett was sentenced in Sept. 2006 to serve at least 3 1/2 years in prison for charges of aggravated robbery and carrying a concealed weapon.

He was seeking clemency in order to try a football comeback as soon as possible, perhaps even in the NFL. With the chances of an early release very unlikely, and the possibility of parole sometime next year for good behavior, Clarett decided to stick it out.

You might be wondering how Clarett relates to the NBA’s age policy. The correlation goes back to the bold decision he made in 2003. After being suspended by Ohio State for the 2003-04 season for rules violations, Clarett sued the NFL for the right to enter its draft. League rules specify that in order to be eligible for the NFL draft, a player is required to be either three years removed from their high school graduation or graduation of the class year with which they entered high school, whichever is earlier.

“He was precluded from playing at Ohio State because of supposed NCAA violations,” says Alan Milstein, Clarett’s lawyer in the case. “He had no other place to go. He was ready to play football. They were ready to hire him. And he just needed to get into the draft.”

In 2002, Clarett came to Ohio State highly-touted and almost immediately showcased his talent as he became the first Buckeye freshman to open the season as the starting running back since 1943. He capped his superb first, and what would be only, season in college football by scoring the winning touchdown in double overtime against Miami to give Ohio State its first national championship in 34 years. On Sept. 10, 2003, a little more than eight months after the title game, Ohio State suspended him for his entire sophomore season. Less than two weeks later, Milstein filed the lawsuit that would challenge the NFL’s policy.

Alan Milstein and Maurice Clarett were all smiles after beating the NFL in district court in Feb. 2004. Three months later, the decision would be overturned in circuit court.

Alan Milstein and Maurice Clarett were all smiles after beating the NFL in district court in Feb. 2004. Three months later, the decision would be overturned in circuit court. (AP photo)

In Feb. 2004, Clarett scored a victory in district court, briefly opening entry into the NFL draft for underclassmen and preps. However, the NFL appealed the ruling in circuit court. On April 19, 2004, days before the draft, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit suspended the district court’s ruling, thus blocking Clarett from the draft. Clarett filed two separate appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court in the days following the circuit court’s decision, but to no avail. Finally, on May 24, the 2nd Circuit made its decision and ruled against Clarett, forcing him to wait until 2005 (when he would be eligible) to enter the NFL. The loss was a crushing blow for Clarett and precipitated his incredible fall. The setback was also tough for Milstein, who has made a successful career out of helping his clients challenge authority and those in power.

“The 2nd circuit was wrong in the way that they ruled on the case,” says Milstein with conviction. “We won at the district court level, lost at the 2nd circuit. We shouldn’t have lost, we should have won.”

Milstein disagrees with skeptics that say football is a different beast than the other pro sports. Surely the physicality of the sport gives the NFL legitimacy in requiring players to be at least three years removed from high school. Right?

“The best hockey player in the world [Sidney Crosby] came out of high school,” says Milstein. “I think the NFL is a kid’s game compared to the NHL as far as the level of violence. If the players are ready to play, they will get drafted. If they’re not ready to play, they won’t make the team.”

Milstein is a staunch proponent of no age limits in professional sports and thinks the policies that professional leagues set run deeper than just meeting their own interests. “I think it’s an outrageous policy [setting age limits], perpetuated by an agreement by the … pro teams to help the NCAA,” says Milstein.

Asked if he would have any interest in challenging the NBA’s policy if he was approached by a client, Milstein replies, “Absolutely.” Spencer Haywood did challenge the NBA — and won — but that was back in 1971. Since the NBA’s new age policy took effect with the 2006 draft, nobody has bothered to contest it in court. Just last year, Brandon Jennings chose to play in Italy for one season instead of trying his luck in the judicial system.

It must be pointed out that this is just speculation and it is unknown if a lawsuit was ever considered by Jennings. Perhaps one day though, a youngster will come along and view litigation as the quickest path to the NBA.

What do you think will happen? Please vote below.





Reviewing the 2008 NBA draft

30 07 2009

This is the fourth in a five-part series reviewing the NBA draft since 2005.

The number of freshmen selected in the first round of the 2008 NBA draft (10) increased by two from 2007. That means one out of every three selections in the first round was a freshman who conceivably could have already been in the league had it not been for the age limit. The first five freshmen taken would almost certainly have been good enough to enter the draft straight from high school.

In order, the freshmen selected in ’08 were: No. 1 Derrick Rose, No. 2 Michael Beasley, No. 3 O.J. Mayo, No. 5 Kevin Love, No. 7 Eric Gordon, No. 11 Jerryd Bayless , No. 14 Anthony Randolph, No. 19 J.J. Hickson, No. 23 Kosta Koufos, and No. 28 Donte Greene. Thus, seven of the 14 lottery picks by NBA teams were spent on one-and-done players, an increase of one from 2007.

Rose, Beasley, Mayo, Love, and Gordon all played significant roles and averaged double figures in scoring in their first seasons. Rose (AP photo) was named the Rookie of Year and helped his Chicago Bulls stretch the defending champion Boston Celtics to a Game 7 in the first round of the playoffs. Mayo led all rookies in scoring at 18.5 points per game.

Chicago Bulls point guard Derrick Rose won the 2008-09 NBA Rookie of the Year award while averaging 16.8 points and 6.3 assists per game.

Chicago Bulls point guard Derrick Rose won the 2008-09 NBA Rookie of the Year award while averaging 16.8 points and 6.3 assists per game.

Despite their fast success, the top two players from last year’s draft have not been able to avoid controversy over their one-year college careers. The NCAA is investigating Memphis‘ basketball program over allegations that Rose’s SAT results were tampered with. Meanwhile, USC is also under investigation for allegations that former coach Tim Floyd paid money to an adviser who then steered Mayo to the Trojans. Both schools could face serious punishments, including the vacating of Memphis’ brilliant 2008 season. The Tigers won an NCAA regular season-record 38 games that season and advanced all the way to the national championship game.

It is likely that similar investigations will continue to pop up every now and then until the NBA and NCAA find a better solution to the current rules. For players who just want to play basketball and begin their pro careers, college can be seen as a waste of time at this point in their lives. Many only go because it’s the next stepping stone. The growing number of one-and-done players hurts both the college and pro game. Top schools lack continuity in their programs and constantly have to decide the risks and rewards of taking on a one-and-done player. Meanwhile, NBA teams get players who are high on talent but low on experience.

Here are the number of selections in the ‘08 draft based on experience (first-round total in parenthesis):

- Freshmen: 12 (10)
- Sophomores: 9 (8)
- Juniors: 8 (3)
- Seniors: 19 (5)
- Foreigners: 11 (4)
- NBDL: 1

For the ’08 draft, 35% of the players taken were underclassmen (sophomores or lower). A whopping 60% of the first-round picks were either freshmen or sophomores. It is probably safe to say that the 2008 draft is the beginning of a new era where we will see the majority of first-round picks be spent on freshmen or sophomores. The most talented players will usually come out early and NBA teams will want to snatch them up before going for more polished upperclassmen. The league will covet youngsters because teams can lock them in for three years on the rookie pay scale, saving them millions of dollars before they finally have to spend the kind of cash worthy of star players.





Should it take an act of Congress?

9 07 2009

Admittedly, I haven’t had the time to post on this blog as frequently as I would have liked over the past month. With one month to go in my project though, I’m going to crank it up.

One newsworthy item over the past month was a Congressman who wrote to the NBA and the players’ association, urging them to end the league’s age limit. Representative Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., said in the letters that the age limit “is an unfair restriction on the rights of these young men to pursue their intended career…”

Cohen (AP photo via The Memphis Commercial Appeal) wants the policy repealed in the NBA’s next collective bargaining agreement. The current agreement runs through 2011. It’s no coincidence that Memphis is in Cohen’s district, and the Congressman even admitted to USA Today that that was a contributing factor.

U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., wants to see the NBA repeal its age limit.

U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., wants to see the NBA repeal its age limit.

The University of Memphis Tigers may be forced by the NCAA to vacate their 38-2 season in 2007-08 because of allegations that one-and-done star and reigning NBA Rookie of the Year Derrick Rose cheated on his SAT. In the fallout, coach John Calipari left for Kentucky and took virtually all of his top recruits with him. What’s left is a basketball program in shambles. A similar situation is happening at USC, where current Memphis Grizzlies forward O.J. Mayo, another one-and-done player, is alleged to have accepted gifts and cash from a sports agency while in school

Cohen told USA Today that the college game is best served by students who pursue their degrees. “The one-and-done kids, they’re not interested in their degrees. They’re not interested in the school. They have to perform there because the NBA doesn’t want to pay for their living.”





The ‘godfather of basketball’

22 06 2009

For John Paul “Sonny” Vaccaro, there are three things more important than anything else in life: “The God you believe in, your family, and earning a living.”

Vaccaro certainly made good on the last point, spending nearly three decades as a highly successful shoe company marketing executive and trusted adviser to some of the greatest basketball players ever seen.

The man who signed Michael Jordan to his first sneaker deal in 1984 and has served as a close confidant to the likes of Kobe Bryant, Tracy McGrady and LeBron James, to name a few, stepped away from his professional career two years ago.

Vaccaro, however, remains an influential figure in basketball. With Vaccaro’s assistance, Brandon Jennings, a talented point guard from Compton, Calif., left to play professionally in Italy after high school last year, forgoing college altogether.

Earlier this year, Vaccaro gave the same blessing to Jeremy Tyler, a 17-year-old standout from San Diego. Tyler, though, is not just skipping college but also his senior year of high school.

The reason behind the pioneering moves made by Jennings and Tyler? The NBA’s 2005 collective bargaining agreement, which required that beginning with the 2006 draft all American players be at least 19 and a year removed from high school.

“In the easiest way to describe it, it was unfair. It wasn’t right because a precedent had been set very successfully in kids who do this,” says Vaccaro. “They don’t have the right to discriminate against your ability to earn a living. I just don’t believe that. Nobody. In any part of society.”

The precedent Vaccaro’s referring to is a 10-year period from 1995-2005 which saw many of the best high school players bypass college for the NBA. In total, 39 preps were drafted in that span, including stars such as Bryant, James, McGrady, Kevin Garnett, Dwight Howard, Al Jefferson, Rashard Lewis, Jermaine O’Neal, and Amare Stoudemire.

Making his case

Vaccaro has his own theories as to why the NBA would enforce an age limit.

“I think the most important reason they did it was that David [Stern], the NBA, can save on the contracts. If you make it 18-plus-one, or any discriminatory age, you automatically delay the future contracts by two or three years,” says Vaccaro. “It’s the third contract that’s the $100 million contract, it’s not the first rookie-based contract. There’s only four years guaranteed and two of them are team options. It’s the delaying the paying of the money, and David Stern and the NBA and the players’ association realize that they can delay the entry level of these kids.”

Vaccaro thinks the change is squarely about the money. He points out that NBA teams can save by holding on to veteran players at mid-level, or even minimum-level salaries, rather than having to open up their wallets for talented younger players.

Vaccaro also bristles at the notion that high school players aren’t ready for the grind of the NBA. To prove his case, he refers to the Cavaliers, Lakers, Magic and Nuggets – the final four teams (hypothetically, the four best teams) in this year’s NBA playoffs. Cleveland’s James, Denver’s J.R. Smith, Los Angeles’ Bryant and Andrew Bynum, and Orlando’s Howard and Lewis – all key contributors to their teams – made the jump from high school.

“Six of the key players, six of them. And they’re not just players,” says Vaccaro excitedly. “So how do you in good faith argue the point that they weren’t ready?”

Sonny Vaccaro signed Michael Jordan to his first shoe deal.

Sonny Vaccaro signed Michael Jordan to his first shoe deal.

If only it were that easy. For all the success stories, there have also been some colossal failures. Names like Jonathan Bender, Darius Miles, Kwame Brown, DeSagana Diop, Shaun Livingston, Robert Swift, and Martell Webster were all lottery picks that haven’t worked out. Others such as Korleone Young, Leon Smith, Ousmane Cisse, Ndudi Ebi, and James Lang barely even broke a sweat in the NBA or saw trouble off the court.

Still, Vaccaro thinks the blame should not rest on the players, successful or otherwise.

“If the professional bodies, the pro teams themselves, don’t think these kids can do it, don’t draft them. Don’t employ them! The thing that’s missing, and even to the public, is the very people who don’t want them to come play in their league, are the very people that draft them,” says Vaccaro.

Responding to criticism

In a May 12 USA Today story, Wally Renfro, an NCAA vice president and senior adviser to NCAA President Myles Brand, spoke negatively of Vaccaro.

“He helped create an environment in which the value of high school and college education has been diminished in the minds of many young basketball players,” Renfro told the newspaper.

When asked about Renfro’s comment, Vaccaro claimed a double standard.

“Wally Renfro’s group [the NCAA] took more money from shoe companies than any other organization in the history of corporate sponsorships. … If he thinks I did these things, then why did he not think I did these things in 1978 when we signed our first colleges?”

Indeed, Vaccaro was the first person to pay college basketball coaches for exclusive apparel deals. He later orchestrated similar agreements with the schools.

“So Wally’s blaming me, and I accept … I publicized and marketed the kids, I accept that. But I also want him to say in the same breathe, ‘Thank you Mr. Vaccaro and Nike for publicizing and marketing Maryland and Georgetown and North Carolina,’” says Vaccaro. “They all sell our products. We’re on their bookshelves, in their bookstores. They let me in the door! No matter who wants to say I demonized or didn’t demonize, it all got its start 30 years ago when they [the NCAA] took the money.”

The future

Vaccaro believes that the NBA will eventually lift the age requirement. If — as Jennings and Tyler have done — more players decide to play in Europe before gaining eligibility, Vaccaro thinks the league will have to react and come up with a resolution to its collective bargaining agreement.

“What Jeremy Tyler did is open the door to a wider spectrum of people. You know, now you’ve got 17-year-old kids who want to do it,” says Vaccaro.

The easy money is certainly hard to argue against. According to Vaccaro, Jennings made over $1 million in salary and endorsements during his one season playing in Italy. That is money “very hard for normal people with college educations to achieve with their degrees,” says Vaccaro.

The alternative is to go to college and become a ‘one-and-done’ player, or one that leaves for the NBA right after becoming eligible. There are a growing number of ‘one-and-done’ players and the ramifications of the NBA’s 2005 rule change are slowly becoming evident. Young NBA stars such as O.J. Mayo and Derrick Rose have been in the news recently for investigations of NCAA rule violations that have been black eyes for the basketball programs at Southern California and Memphis.

Vaccaro makes it very clear that he is not against youngsters getting their educations. For most of his clients, going to college to forward their basketball careers is the right decision. Only a very selective group of high school players is physically capable and talented enough to make the jump to the NBA. For the few preps that fit that description and come from humble means, the choice between going to college or turning pro is often very clear.

“How do they [critics] beat me up? How do they beat this whole system up? When someone can take themselves off of welfare basically and have money in the bank,” says Vaccaro. “Isn’t it interesting? These kids are doing it the right way; they’re trying to make a living with their talent. We’re talking about people capable of earning money legally — without resorting to any criminal activity!”